Main

November 30, 2009

Validation At Last!

“Night owls are smarter than other people, and now we may know why.” states the first line in of the article ““The Evolution of Night Owls in Psychology Today magazine, December 2009, by Matthew Hutson, staff news editor. Seems they have now found a correlation between staying up late and high IQs. The “very bright” stay up later and rise later than the “very dull” (their labels, not mine). The article sites Satoshi Kanazawa, a psychologist at the London School of Economics and Political Science, who argues,
“And he has data showing that people with higher IQs are more likely to have values and preferences that just didn’t make sense for our ancestors to embrace. One of those is staying up late.”
Well, I have always thought that people who called 8:00 a.m. Monday morning staff meetings were dumb and now I have proof!  All snarking aside, I did my own personal study around this when I was in college. I have never being an early morning person. My father was a night owl too. So was my mother’s mother. It’s genetic. So having to make early morning classes was always a struggle. My worst was history of art and architecture, 8 a.m., and then they turned the lights off for the slides to boot. Lots of head bobbing in that class.
One year I did an experiment. My hypothesis was that it wasn’t about the amount of sleep, but rather the hours on the clock I slept. So set up a schedule and parameters – six hours of sleep a night. The first week 11:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m.; the second midnight to 6 a.m..; the last week 1:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. Needless to say I woke more refreshed, alert and was more productive during the day with the latter schedule. Another indicator, with the 5a.m. rising I usually woke up feeling slightly nauseous. The 7a.m. wake up, no problem.
I have since experimented further. Left to my own devices, no boundaries on bedtime and no alarm upon waking, I will naturally gravitate to the later hours. Also, if I truly allow myself to do this for an extended period of time, I will start to wake up with the seasonal sunrise. This means in the summer I will get up at the crack of dawn without an alarm clock, happy to greet the early summer days. Doesn’t that just seem smarter?!

 

April 09, 2007

Time = Money = Time

April, 2007

This is a “rant”. I borrow the term from my good friends Charlie and Jim. My rant is based on a frustration. I think most rants are. My particular frustration is my inability to access my blog control panel, leaving me unable to post new blogs. My level of frustration has increased as I experience the game of Customer Service Dodge Ball between my web site host and my blog host. Each is working very hard to evade the ball of responsibility thrown at them to fix my access problem. First prize is a “It’s not my problem/job, we don’t support it” medal. So far the web host is winning with their strategy of flat out “We don’t support it”.

There are two things at issue causing. First, there is they have broken the implied, no, expressed covenant that makes business work. If I pay you for something, what you provide me should work. In the above case, this covenant has not only been broken, but is costing me exponentially more than what I paid for it.

How can this cost me more? The answer leads to the second issue – personal productivity. If I pay, let’s say $60.00 dollars for a product and it doesn’t work and it takes me 28 hours of wrestling with Customer Service to get that product to work, or as in all of the cases above and below, never works, I am really out of pocket much more than that initial cash investment. If after 28 hours, at just the minimum wage of $6.20, (which btw, is substantially less than my time is worth, but I will use for the sake of argument) the product in reality costs me $173.60 or over 2 1/2 times the initial price. Add the blog issue time to the - time spent with the first, then the second, scanner that didn’t work; and my cell phone issue time; and my current tally of lost hours over the past year is around 60 hours, and still counting. I am now into the thousands of dollars worth of lost productivity for a couple of hundred dollars of expenditure.

Admittedly, 60 hours spread over a year is only 5 hours a month. Even this is way too much.  If you extrapolate this number – 5 hours X roughly 200,000,000 adults between the ages of 15- and 64 in American it comes to one billion hours of lost productivity, or over 6 billion dollars in lost productivity or purchasing power per month. That is $74 billion per year. Dollars that could be spent on the purchase of more products, thereby increasing the GNP. Time that could and should be better spent – on family, friends, job, career, building new businesses or just that old American pastime of the pursuit of happiness.

If you are an executive in a corporation out there, you need to start to understand and realize the extent of this issue. This is why the time regained by telecommuting or applied to work/life balance is so important and such a precious commodity to your employees. Are you contributing to the solution or this problem? Take a closer.
  •  Look internally - to what extent do your own systems contribute to the company’s loss in employee productivity – both personal and company? They are really one in the same.
  • Are you still operating under the misguided assumption that 100% of an employee's time spent sitting at their desk equals 100% productivity?
  • Have you really built an organizational support infrastructure (OSI) that supports employee productivity or does it get in the way more than it paves the way?
  • If your employees are starting to work remotely, are you augmenting your current OSI to support work out of the office?
  • Look externally – are the production and delivery of your products or services adding to the problem? If they rob people of personal time, it will come back to bite you on the behind. How much of people’s personal time you steal will directly effect their individual performance at work.  

What could you do with 60 lost hours of time? A lot I am sure.

 

December 13, 2005

The Importance of Being Earnest in Actions

December 13, 2005

While listening to Joan Didion discuss her latest wrting effort on a City Arts & Lectures program, broadcast on one of my local public radio stations KQED, I was reminded of the event that cemented the importance of new work places for me. The book, "The Year of Magical Thinking", recounts her during the illness of her daughter and after the sudden death of her husband, writer John Gregory Dunne.”T

The subject of dealing with illness was what recalled the event that occurred when I was working with Sun Microsystems on their Satellite offices. Sitting in one near my home, I was asking employees why they had chosen to work at the new site. One gentleman had a story that still resonates today. He was there because his wife had cancer. Working at this site, closer to home, allowed him to be near her if she needed help. That particular day, he was there to do some work while waiting to pick her up after a chemotherapy treatment.

Sun satellites were small alternative office facilities. Separate from the corporate campus in the California, they were located geographically closer to employees’ homes. Back then, in order for the general Sun population to log into Sun’s system they needed to be at a Sun Workstation. This made access from some place other than a Sun office difficult and working at home almost impossible. Some engineers had ISDN lines, but then laptops and broadband DSL or cable connections were in no way ubiquitous, for Sun employees or anyone. Hard to believe that was only a short time ago. Sun originally opened three satellite offices as prototypes for different places where employees could
“drop-in”, the name later attached to the sites. Much of the original intent was to mitigate commutes. Employees could stop at these workplaces, grab an open workspace, do email, make phone calls and then later, when traffic died down, continue on to their assigned office on campus.

As usage evolved, employee’s found various reasons to work at the facility. But this man’s story was so powerful it has always been the best example, and for all the right reasons, why different office places should exist. Empathy for another human being in
crisis, desire to help the employee and his or her family, true work/life balance enabling – all ways good companies want to treat their workers, yet rarely take the real steps to make the aspirations possible. If this man did not have this new type of workplace available, his options would have been limited or worse - ignore his wife’s needs because work was more important, try to commute back and forth to his office adding stress and worry resulting in less attention and quality paid to either entity – work and family, or the perhaps quit working completely.

Sun’s action, whether meant for this specific result or not, created a win-win for both. Tangibly, the company gained productivity, which might otherwise been lost, and the employee gained relief from stress and angst during a time of extreme hardship.  The
intangible gains included mutual respect, trust, consideration and perhaps even today’s rare commodity of loyalty. As sincere the desire may be for companies to create the best place to work, good intentions are not enough. They must be followed by earnest actions – which means development of the actual infrastructure that brings intent to fruition.